Texmacs therefore symbol12/25/2022 ![]() ![]() Such things sound like minor issues, but anyone will FIRST find the Under File > Page Setup and under Document > Page > Size.Īt the least, the menu should be called "Print setup". ![]() Page Setup: There are two places where the page size can be set: tm files at all, hide them byĭefault, or at least issue a warning when the user tries to open Unfortunate setting may mean that you lose all of your work. Option to restrict it to TeXmacs files, e.g.tm +. "Open"?) dialog shows all file types (in fact there is no Tm Files: By default, the "File > Load" (BTW, why not Indicator/warning if there are any undefined references or The PDF to check if there are any undefined reference. TeXmacs to regenerate everything, and searched for "?" in This canĬreate very hard-to-spot errors in your document. Times), while it should display "?" instead. Is unchanged (even after Document > Update > All, multiple I loosely ordered the items in order of descendingĭeleted references: TeXmacs indefinitely remembers references it has Getting used to, and performance issues that are relevant when editing Things than can ruin the output by silently introducing errors,Īnnoying things that are just counter-intuitive or take a lot of time It is organized in three parts: dangerous Large documents), and to get the stylesheet language as solid and as The existing code as stable and fast as possible (in particular for To the list below, I think that the upmost priority should be to get Scientific editor, but long-term usability is just bad. Innovative features and flexibility by now to beat any other ![]() In my opinion TeXmacs has more than enough Very frustrating having to deal with mysterious crashes and figuringĬurrently it seems that new features are added all the time, such as Which I know that it is hard to get used to, but it is stable. With hindsight, I have to say that had I knownĪll the problems I have encountered, I had probably chosen LaTeX, from Is easy to get used to, but extremely crashy when trying to do While LaTeX needs a huge amount of work in order to get anĪcceptable workflow, when correctly set up it is rock solid. Provides a solid stable foundation that users and publishers canĭepend on. However, I think TeXmacs can only compete with LaTeX if it Path, and so that maybe Joris (or someone else who knows the sources)ĭon't get me wrong, I like TeXmacs, and it works very well for smallĭocuments. That I thought I'd share them, in case anyone wants to take a similar I found myself developing so many workaround However, this time I chose to use TeXmacs from theīeginning to the end. Regularly used TeXmacs for the "draft" phase of variousĭocuments (for which it really shines), and used LaTeX for the final I have been using TeXmacs for several years now, and until now The project has about 200 pages and 40įloats. I just finished a major project (thesis) using TeXmacs, and I wanted ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |